-
Spot
ether
exchange-traded
funds
successfully
debuted
in
the
U.S.
on
Tuesday,
but
regulators
didn’t
let
the
ETFs
generate
income
for
investors
by
staking
their
ETH. -
The
absence
represents
a
disadvantage
over
directly
holding
the
cryptocurrency,
but
issuers
are
hopeful
regulators
will
eventually
allow
staking.
Eight
newly
approved
spot
ether
(ETH)
exchange-traded
funds
got
off
to
a
busy
start
following
their
debut
this
week,
despite
lacking
a
key
feature
of
Ethereum’s
native
token:
staking
income.
While
the
Grayscale
Ethereum
Trust
(ETHE),
which
has
existed
in
non-ETF
form
for
years
but
just
converted
into
an
ETF,
has
seen
about
$811
million
of
outflows,
new
products
from
the
likes
of
BlackRock
saw
almost
$800
million
deposited
in
the
first
two
days.
Issuers
say
they’re
pleased.
This
early
success
wasn’t
a
given,
especially
after
several
issuers
announced
that
they
would
not
stake
ether
for
yield,
which
they
had
initially
planned
to
do
in
earlier
filings.
This
was
likely
due
to
the
U.S.
Securities
and
Exchange
Commission
telling
them
to
remove
the
feature
as
staking
could
potentially
violate
federal
securities
laws
as
it
constitutes
unregistered
securities
offerings,
as
the
SEC
had
previously
argued
in
other
cases.
With
a
new
administration
taking
office
in
January,
things
could
change
quickly
and
issuers
remain
hopeful
that
the
feature
could
eventually
become
part
of
the
products.
That
being
said,
it
is
not
currently
“an
active
discussion,”
Rob
Mitchnick,
head
of
digital
assets
for
BlackRock,
said
in
an
interview
with
CoinDesk.
He
added
that
the
SEC
made
its
view
on
that
clear.
BlackRock,
the
world’s
largest
asset
manager,
did
not
initially
apply
to
be
able
to
stake
in
their
application
but
others,
including
Fidelity
and
Franklin
Templeton,
did.
“I
certainly
would
hope
that
as
an
industry,
we’re
going
to
be
able
to
help
to
educate
and
provide
perspective
on
how
it
is
that
we
can
bring
staking
capabilities
to
investors
in
these
products,”
said
Cynthia
Lo
Bessette,
head
of
digital
asset
management
at
Fidelity.
“Staking
is
a
critical
component
of
the
Ethereum
ecosystem
as
it
is
the
activity
that
secures
the
ecosystem
and
so,
therefore,
it’s
an
important
part
of
the
investment
experience
and
being
able
to
invest
in
your
ether.”
Former
President
Donald
Trump
seems
to
have
won
over
the
hearts
of
many
leaders
in
the
crypto
industry
and
is
their
favored
choice
in
this
year’s
election
given
his
recent
endorsement
of
the
space.
“I
believe
staking
within
spot
ether
ETFs
is
a
matter
of
when,
not
if,”
said
Nate
Geraci,
president
of
the
ETF
Store.
“That
said,
there
is
no
question
that
politics
are
intertwined
with
the
timing
of
the
‘when.'”
He
added:
“Indications
are
that
a
Trump
administration
would
be
much
more
crypto-friendly,
which
could
certainly
accelerate
the
timeline
of
when
staking
might
be
allowed.
Otherwise,
ETF
issuers
could
be
left
waiting
on
a
comprehensive
crypto
regulatory
framework
to
be
put
in
place,
which
would
likely
take
significantly
longer.”
For
Franklin
Templeton,
who,
like
Fidelity,
was
keen
on
making
staking
a
part
of
the
ETFs,
starting
without
that
feature
seemed
natural
and
made
the
overall
process
of
getting
the
product
approved
easier.
“The
easier
path
or
path
of
least
resistance
was
clearly
to
do
it
as
an
unstaked
version,”
said
Christopher
Jensen,
director
of
digital
asset
research
for
Franklin
Templeton’s
Digital
Asset
Investment
Strategies
Group.
“It
just
works
better,
it’s
simpler,
it’s
easier,
and
the
execution
risk
was
lower,
so
I
think
it’s
very
natural
that
that’s
where
we
started.”
If
staking
will
be
part
of
the
ETFs
in
the
future,
it
doesn’t
seem
to
be
up
to
the
asset
managers,
but
is
a
question
of
whether
the
regulatory
landscape
in
the
future
will
be
open
to
it.
“I
think
it’s
very
tied
into
the
regulatory
clarity
that
we
think
will
happen
over
time
of
whether
that
will
or
won’t
happen,”
said
David
Mann,
head
of
ETF
product
&
capital
markets
for
Franklin.
“This
is
the
framework
we’re
dealing
with
today
and
if
it
evolves,
we’ll
be
ready
to
evolve
with
it.”